Guest
Banned
Hello all. I just joined the group and it seems there's a wealth of knowlege here. The L46 guns really appeal to me - their simplicity, accuracy and workmanship. They seem to meet the scientific criteria of "necessary and sufficient." They don't have "unnecessary" gegaws, but the characteristics they do have are "sufficient" to get the job done.
I'll jump in with a question. Some years ago I traded into an L46 that was supposedly a retired benchrest gun. It has a laminated wood stock, approximatel 1.25" untapered barrel roughly 20" long in .222 Remington. I was told the barrel had been cut down from 28" or so. It has a solid bottom L46 action - no magazine cutout.
Can anyone offer some history of the L46 action? Were they made in single-shot configuration or was this one welded up in some manner? If it was welded, the workmanship is excellent. Were these common on the benchrest circuit in, I'm guessing, the late 50's or early 60's?
Thanks,
Wildey
I'll jump in with a question. Some years ago I traded into an L46 that was supposedly a retired benchrest gun. It has a laminated wood stock, approximatel 1.25" untapered barrel roughly 20" long in .222 Remington. I was told the barrel had been cut down from 28" or so. It has a solid bottom L46 action - no magazine cutout.
Can anyone offer some history of the L46 action? Were they made in single-shot configuration or was this one welded up in some manner? If it was welded, the workmanship is excellent. Were these common on the benchrest circuit in, I'm guessing, the late 50's or early 60's?
Thanks,
Wildey