• Hey All! Lately there has been more and more scammers on the forum board. They register and replies to members requests for guns and/or parts or other things. The reply contains a gmail or hotmail address or similar ”anonymous” email addresses which they want you to reply to. DO NOT ANSWER ANY STRANGE MESSAGES! They often state something like this: ”Hello! Saw your post about purchasing a stock for a Safari. KnuckleheadBob has one. Email him at: [email protected]” If you receive any strange messages: Check the status of whoever message you. If they have no posts and signed up the same day or very recently, stay away. Same goes for other members they might refer to. Check them too and if they are long standing members, PM them and ask if the message is legit. Most likely it’s not. Then use the report function in each message or post so I can kick them out! Beware of anything that might seem fishy! And again, for all of you who registered your personal name as username, please contact me so I can change it to a more anonymous username. You’d be surprised of how much one can find out about a person from just a username on a forum such ad our! All the best! And be safe! Jim

L46 Singleshot?

Sako Collectors Club Discussion Forum

Guest

Banned
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
4,151
Location
Some city, some country
Hello all. I just joined the group and it seems there's a wealth of knowlege here. The L46 guns really appeal to me - their simplicity, accuracy and workmanship. They seem to meet the scientific criteria of "necessary and sufficient." They don't have "unnecessary" gegaws, but the characteristics they do have are "sufficient" to get the job done.

I'll jump in with a question. Some years ago I traded into an L46 that was supposedly a retired benchrest gun. It has a laminated wood stock, approximatel 1.25" untapered barrel roughly 20" long in .222 Remington. I was told the barrel had been cut down from 28" or so. It has a solid bottom L46 action - no magazine cutout.

Can anyone offer some history of the L46 action? Were they made in single-shot configuration or was this one welded up in some manner? If it was welded, the workmanship is excellent. Were these common on the benchrest circuit in, I'm guessing, the late 50's or early 60's?

Thanks,

Wildey
 
Wildy, I have a 222 in singleshot. It was made in 1957. I just acquired factory scope rings and a factory peep sight is on the way. I found the receiver in a bunch of gun related stuff that I bought. I made the sear bar and bolt release lever and housing. I chambered a Shilen #2 barrel and built a stock from 50 yr. old black walnut. I haven't had an opportunity to shoot it yet.
Butch
 
According to a 1971 article on Sako Rifles, the Single Shot L46 action was introduced in 1956-57 as a Benchrest Action. The bottom of the receiver was solid with no magazine well opening.
I will be scanning this article in the next week or so and placing it in the Documents section.
Gordon
 
I have a rifle built on the L46 Benchrest action-built by Harry Creighton of Nashville TN in the late 60's . It has a heavy Douglas barrel chambered for .222 in a Bishop Varmint style stock-equipped with Unertl 16X scope. As a previous poster indicated this is a true single-shot action, not a welded up job. They also continued to make the action in the L461 and Forester actiions for several years. They were sold as actions only as I recall -although you could buy barreled actions in the magazine style configuration. You could also buy barrels separately from Firearms International Mr Creighton said . However, I opted for the Douglas.
I do not know if these were common on the Benchrest circuit-but you never saw many in the hands of causual benchresters or varmint hunters. Probably because the out-of-the-box L46 and L461 heavy barrels shot so well.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top