waterwolf
Well-Known Member
I have often heard (generally from people that don't and won't own them) that fullstock "Mannlicher-style" hunting rifles are not as accurate as half-stock rifles.
I recently obtained an excellent condition Sako L579 Forester fullstock in .243 (made in 1966). I mounted an old Swarovski 4X using low original Sako rings so that the scope just barely cleared the bolt handle. Yesterday was its first outing at the range. Using the cheapest hunting ammunition I could find (Federal 100 gr. softpoints), it consistently shot 5/8 inch groups @ 100 yards.
The same afternoon my new Sako 85 Bavar fullstock carbine in 6.5x55 with an old Swarovski 1.5-4.5 shot discount brand factory ammo (Fiocchi 140 gr SST) into 3/4 inch groups @ 100 yards.
There is also a myth that relatively cheap discount brand hunting ammo is necessarily inaccurate.
I recently obtained an excellent condition Sako L579 Forester fullstock in .243 (made in 1966). I mounted an old Swarovski 4X using low original Sako rings so that the scope just barely cleared the bolt handle. Yesterday was its first outing at the range. Using the cheapest hunting ammunition I could find (Federal 100 gr. softpoints), it consistently shot 5/8 inch groups @ 100 yards.
The same afternoon my new Sako 85 Bavar fullstock carbine in 6.5x55 with an old Swarovski 1.5-4.5 shot discount brand factory ammo (Fiocchi 140 gr SST) into 3/4 inch groups @ 100 yards.
There is also a myth that relatively cheap discount brand hunting ammo is necessarily inaccurate.
Last edited: