bigbear
Well-Known Member
Given the expense of components that factor alone justifies the cost of a chronograph. I had a Labradar, purchased after I shot my first chronograph a PACT "screen" version. The old one was bought years ago when I competed (using that term very loosely ) in IPSC shooting. It came paired with a timer. in spite of the bullet wound it still worked but I was tired of spotty results due to changing light conditions. I was gifted a Garmin and sold my Labradar. Regular use of the chronograph is extremely helpful. For instance I found out my sako 75 is 80fps faster than my old Remington 700 with my favourite factory ammo. Maybe the Remington is showing it's age (500+rounds) or the Sako has a faster barrel.
When testing loads it is very helpful to see that that "flier" in your otherwise great group was 70fps slower than the other shots in the group... so the flier reflected my poor reloading skills rather than a reflection on that particular load recipe.
So, if you shoot a fair amount a chronograph is a must. If you plan to do any long range shooting a chrono also is a must.
Cheers, I gotta go do some reloading, looking for an accurate 2950+/- 25fps, accurate 180gr Accubond 300 WinMag load for my new to me Sako 75. (anybody got any good 300 Winmag loads to share?)
When testing loads it is very helpful to see that that "flier" in your otherwise great group was 70fps slower than the other shots in the group... so the flier reflected my poor reloading skills rather than a reflection on that particular load recipe.
So, if you shoot a fair amount a chronograph is a must. If you plan to do any long range shooting a chrono also is a must.
Cheers, I gotta go do some reloading, looking for an accurate 2950+/- 25fps, accurate 180gr Accubond 300 WinMag load for my new to me Sako 75. (anybody got any good 300 Winmag loads to share?)