• Hey All! Lately there has been more and more scammers on the forum board. They register and replies to members requests for guns and/or parts or other things. The reply contains a gmail or hotmail address or similar ”anonymous” email addresses which they want you to reply to. DO NOT ANSWER ANY STRANGE MESSAGES! They often state something like this: ”Hello! Saw your post about purchasing a stock for a Safari. KnuckleheadBob has one. Email him at: [email protected]” If you receive any strange messages: Check the status of whoever message you. If they have no posts and signed up the same day or very recently, stay away. Same goes for other members they might refer to. Check them too and if they are long standing members, PM them and ask if the message is legit. Most likely it’s not. Then use the report function in each message or post so I can kick them out! Beware of anything that might seem fishy! And again, for all of you who registered your personal name as username, please contact me so I can change it to a more anonymous username. You’d be surprised of how much one can find out about a person from just a username on a forum such ad our! All the best! And be safe! Jim

Correct Period Scope

Sako Collectors Club Discussion Forum

Guest

Banned
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
4,151
Location
Some city, some country
I recently purchased a Pre-Garcia 30.06 Finnbear for a bargain price. It's used but in pristine condition. It came to me with stainless rings holding a Thompson-Center Hawken Hunter 4-12X44 scope.

Yikes! I've been temped to stencil "I DIDN'T DO THIS" on the tube of the scope.

Where I hunt, a 100yd shot would be extreme range, so this caliber is overkill to start with. I certainly don't need 12x magnification. What I'd like to do is track down a period scope in 3x or so and then remount with proper rings and bases, preferable something removable so I can also use an aperture sight. My question is this: what would have been a "classic" scope commonly mounted on late 60's/early 70's Sakos? I've been finding some Weavers on Ebay, but I'm looking for other options as well.

Thanks for reading!

jrw
 
SAKO's came pre-packaged with Seeadler-Optik brand scopes in 6 or 8 power. (germany). if this attachment doesn't work, email me, I'll send you a copy of their catalogue.
 
I bought several of the sako Finnbear/Forester rifles during the sixties. Always used the sako Mounts-everything else was ugly. Most Sako owners avoided the weaver scopes-very poor low light performance and not really moisture proof. Some opted for the TV style redfields. I used 4x Lyman All Americans with perfect satistfaction. The Finnbears are heavy as is, and today's huge variables make a bad sitiuation worse. Just my .02.
 
I don't think you could go wrong with a B&L; Balvar 2 1/2x6 with removable mounts
You can find them on ebay and the optics are fantastic for this type of scope.
I have been using this setup on my L57 Sako since I got the gun.
 
I have the same Finnbear you have - purchased in 1967 plus another custom Sako built on the L61 action by Paul Jaeger in 1966. Both still have the original scopes. One is a 2-7X Redfield and the other is a Leupold 2-7X. I used Redfield rings and bases exclusively.

I also have several 1960's era Weaver scopes still in service, and they have all performed flawlessly for over 40 years. One, a K10, has been on a Sako .222 Magnum HB since 1965, and it will shoot 10 shot sub 1-inch groups all day. I've probably owned 25 or so El Paso-built Weaver scopes over the years, and have never had one fog or even need servicing.

You can find plenty of vintage scopes on Ebay.
 
My first Sako was an L61R purchased new in 1965. I put a 3-9 Leupold Vari-X on it, and it is still there today. However, this was a .264 and intended (and since used on many an occasion) for open country deer and antelope. A contemporary scope that might be more suited to your needs would be a Leupold M8 4x. Such a scope from that period in nice condition is usually available on ebay for $100-125. A 3x Leupold M8 would also be appropriate, but since Leupold no longer makes that scope, the price of a used one is higher than the 4x. Contemporary mounts would be either the original Sakos or perhaps Redfields. With either, use the lowest ring available for a 4x Leupold.

Hopefully, the previous owner(s) left the sling swivels in place rather than replacing them with Q.D. studs.
 
Hello.....You don't need a scope, just the peep sight. 100 yard shots are for hard sights not scopes. The Sako peep is excellent. Regards, Rick.
 
Nothing looks more classic than a 4X Leupold unless it is the 2-7X. They pretty much look the same today as they did when your rifle was new. At the time the big discussion was should it be a 6x or a 4X but you have already answered that question.
 
Thanks, folks! This is exactly the information I'm looking for. One more quick question, were the original Sako rings all quick-release for alternation with the peep sight? Or is that a later development? I'd like to have the best of both worlds and use the peep and scope. Isn't this what the rifle was designed for, or am I going to be chewing up the receiver by mounting/dismounting the scope?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top