This subject and this dealer have both come up for negative comments before, but when I checked out his latest offering on Guns International I felt he has gone yet another step beyond acceptable practices.
So here's the title of the ad: "Sako Riihimaki .22 Hornet. Deluxe. Super Rare Caliber". If you want a rebarreled, restocked, reblued L46 .22 Hornet for $4,000, then here it is: http://www.gunsinternational.com/gu...eluxe-super-rare-caliber.cfm?gun_id=100691969
Unfortunately, the ad says nothing about its being restocked, just that it has a "Gorgeously Crafted Deluxe Stock". The ad says nothing about its having a replacement barrel, even though anyone familiar with Sakos can see that the ".22 Hornet" stamped longitudinally on the side of the barrel is NOT factory Sako. The ad says nothing about being reblued, even though the (quite lovely) bluing job is clearly not 60 years old. And the bottom metal has no engraving as a Deluxe would have had.
The original rifle would have had a non-Monte Carlo stock, and to the knowledge of anyone who has researched it, no Deluxes were being offered as early as 1955 when the gun was made (not 1956 as the ad states the date of the gun).
No question that this seller has created quite a nice rifle, using a genuine Sako action. But it he is clearly attempting to allow a less-sophisticated buyer to believe that the rifle is genuine and original. Shame on "Custom Shop" once again.
So here's the title of the ad: "Sako Riihimaki .22 Hornet. Deluxe. Super Rare Caliber". If you want a rebarreled, restocked, reblued L46 .22 Hornet for $4,000, then here it is: http://www.gunsinternational.com/gu...eluxe-super-rare-caliber.cfm?gun_id=100691969
Unfortunately, the ad says nothing about its being restocked, just that it has a "Gorgeously Crafted Deluxe Stock". The ad says nothing about its having a replacement barrel, even though anyone familiar with Sakos can see that the ".22 Hornet" stamped longitudinally on the side of the barrel is NOT factory Sako. The ad says nothing about being reblued, even though the (quite lovely) bluing job is clearly not 60 years old. And the bottom metal has no engraving as a Deluxe would have had.
The original rifle would have had a non-Monte Carlo stock, and to the knowledge of anyone who has researched it, no Deluxes were being offered as early as 1955 when the gun was made (not 1956 as the ad states the date of the gun).
No question that this seller has created quite a nice rifle, using a genuine Sako action. But it he is clearly attempting to allow a less-sophisticated buyer to believe that the rifle is genuine and original. Shame on "Custom Shop" once again.